Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3E4B9BBF.6070308@onevision.de>
Date:	Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:21:03 +0100
From:	Roland Schwingel <Roland DOT Schwingel AT onevision DOT de>
Organization:	OneVision Software AG
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language:	de, de-de, en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: bash broken with cygwin 1.3.20? - now working with 1.3.20
References:	<3E4B7F49 DOT 3020207 AT onevision DOT de> <3E4B8423 DOT 7030809 AT onevision DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<3E4B8423.7030809@onevision.de>

Hello Max (and the list of course)

 > > mkdir gcc-3.2.1_obj
 > > cd gcc-3.2.1_obj
 > > ../gcc-3.2.1/configure <whatever options>
 > > It fails with
 > > *** "Can't find configure.in. Try using --srcdir=some_dir"
 >
 > Please post the output of 'ls -l ../gcc-3.2.1/configure.in'.
-rwx------+   1 Administ Entwickl    55070 Jul  8  2002 
../gcc-3.2.1-ov/configure.in

*BINGO!!!!*
Thanks Max... That appears to be the reason! Even I have administrator
privileges it is not working with 1.3.20. After chowning it configure works
again.

The question is what has changed in 1.3.20 that broke this. Or what was
broken in 1.3.19 enabling it to work there? (btw. I have ntsec enabled)

 > > /cygdrive/c/temp/gcc-3.2.1_objc/../gcc-3.2.1
 >                              >>>^<<<
 > Typo? Or is that exactly what it says?
Some kind of both... I need to enable objc. It worked very fine
in the past. Additionally we added an additional command to gcc
for optimized objc code generation and so we altered some parts
of gcc. A made some changes and now need to recompile it.
(The changes are far far away of being acceptable by the FSF therefore
we did not yet post them to the gcc crew)

But here it is a typo. I simplified the pathes in my posting and then 
made the typo.
On my machine I had the correct pathes!

Thanks for your help,

Roland



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -