Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sun, 9 Feb 2003 00:18:49 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Btw
Message-ID:	<20030209051849.GC20171@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030209050710 DOT GA20142 AT redhat DOT com> <020c01c2cff9$bec0ade0$6b7c86d9 AT webdev>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<020c01c2cff9$bec0ade0$6b7c86d9@webdev>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 05:11:46AM -0000, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
>> I think this is the first cygwin release that has reached "20" since
>> B20.  I hope that's a good sign.
>
>Does that mean that instead of "1.3.20 is mashed...I'm going back to B20"
>it'll be "3.9.450 is mullered I'm rolling back to 1.3.20"? ;-)

Something like that.  Or, maybe when people start talking about B20 we can
say:

"You mean 1.3.20, right?"

"Uh, right, I think."

"Ok.  You should definitely drop back to *20, then."

At least that will get people into this millenium.

Hmm.  I think I'll have to build one massive .exe file with the whole
cygwin distribution in it for this subterfuge to work.

"Um, I don't think it took 18 hours for B20 to load before."

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -