Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:50:12 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [METOO]: GCC from cvs builds with Feb 7 snapshot
Message-ID:	<20030207185012.GA8963@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<001101c2ced8$c53b70a0$2101a8c0 AT BRAEMARINC DOT COM>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<001101c2ced8$c53b70a0$2101a8c0@BRAEMARINC.COM>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:43:11PM -0600, Gary R Van Sickle wrote:
>No more Signal 11's, all is as it should be.  HOORAY!

I think we have Jonathan Larmour to thank for this.  He performed quite
a service to cygwin by tracking this problem down.  It didn't look like
an easy one to fix either.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -