Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:46:00 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] TERM=cygwin missing in the output of dircolors from fileutils-4.1-1
Message-ID:	<20030205214600.GA11184@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0302051628000 DOT 20678-200000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0302051628000.20678-200000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 04:38:26PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>This is primarily addressed to Chris Faylor (as the fileutils maintainer).
>I've submitted a patch that includes TERM=cygwin in the dircolors output
>back in October 2002 (<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-10/msg00918.html>).
>This seems to have been slipped through the cracks.
>
>I'm aware that we are on the latest version of GNU fileutils, but, as the
>patch is specific to Cygwin, would this make it worthwhile to release
>fileutils-4.1-2?  I haven't seen any complaints about it lately, though,
>so no rush, I guess...

I'd appreciate it if you would submit this patch to the upstream maintainer.

I think that the plan is to get rid of fileutils in favor of a "coreutils",
though.  I haven't seen a coreutils release yet.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -