Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:39:53 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Bug in path.cc (conv_path_list_buf_size)
Message-ID:	<20030205213953.GA11032@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030205164021 DOT GA1408 AT stonie DOT insonic DOT com> <20030205210237 DOT GB30513 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20030205210237.GB30513@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 04:02:37PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:40:21PM +0100, Daniel Steinmann wrote:
>>The above mentioned function returns sometimes a too small buffer
>>size. This problem was found when using 'cygpath --path --windows'
>>
>>I see following solutions:
>>
>>a) Increase the slop.
>>
>>b) Make the size estimation more precise by adding the size of
>>   the current working directory for each relativ path element.
>>
>>What do you think?
>
>I'll add something which should suffice to work around the problem for
>1.3.20.

There is a new snapshot up with the change, if you want to try it.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -