delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:26:06 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | document heap_chunk_in_mb? |
Message-ID: | <20030203182606.GA14353@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.1i |
Any volunteers to document heap_chunk_in_mb? It's conspicuously missing in the documentation, AFAICT. Although, hmm, I haven't seen many complaints about this recently. That's odd. Maybe the overflow code in the new malloc is actually working. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |