Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 31 Jan 2003 23:09:41 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: /usr/bin/tclsh84
Message-ID:	<20030201040941.GA20785@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3E3B3B6B DOT 8020308 AT eCosCentric DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3E3B3B6B.8020308@eCosCentric.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 03:13:47AM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>Ah another day another tclsh.

Ah, another hour, another tcl/tk whinge.

>Even if it's only a soft link to the most recently installed tclshNN
>(like RPM post-install scripts do for the linux kernel etc.).  I know
>cygwin has got post-install scripts, so any reason not to?

I don't know what post-install scripts have to do with anything but I'll
add symbolic links to everything in the cygwin tcl release if it stops
just one of these tcl/tk complaints.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -