Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<20030131215314.61490.qmail@mail.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
From:	"Mo Awad" <mawad AT mail DOT com>
To:	"William A. Hoffman" <billlist AT nycap DOT rr DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:53:14 -0500
Subject:	Re: Latest TCL/TK breaks Python's tkinter
X-Originating-Ip:	217.44.228.34
X-Originating-Server:	ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com

Could someone help me get off this list?????
----- Original Message -----
From: "William A. Hoffman" <billlist AT nycap DOT rr DOT com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:02:58 -0500
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Latest TCL/TK breaks Python's tkinter

> At 03:15 PM 1/31/2003 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 02:34:29PM -0500, William A. Hoffman wrote:
> >>>It's strange that every new release of tcl/tk breaks all past programs
> >>>which rely on it.
> >>
> >>I would not say that this is strange.  The tcl/tk that is in cygwin, is
> >>only for insight/gdb, as the comment says.  It is not a full
> >>distribution of tcl/tk.  See the thread "tclsh83.exe should be
> >>cygtclsh83.exe".
> >
> >Who do you think releases tcl/tk?  I don't know why you'd think that I
> >don't know what's going on here.  This was basically a *generic*
> 
> That is a good question, I assume from the tone of your question, it is you.
> However, I searched the cygwin-apps announce for the new release of tcl/tk
> and found no mention of it.  There is also no /usr/doc directory for tcl/tk.  
> 
> I guess I am still a bit upset, that the tcl/tk from setup no longer does 
> what I need it to do.   The older one was a more complete although very old
> release.  I do not think that a tcl/tk release meant only for python and gdb
> is a very general solution.   And there is a complete port of tcl/tk that works
> with cygwin, so why not use that one.
> 
> 
> -Bill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 

-- 
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -