Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/01/31/16:03:56
At 03:15 PM 1/31/2003 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 02:34:29PM -0500, William A. Hoffman wrote:
>>>It's strange that every new release of tcl/tk breaks all past programs
>>>which rely on it.
>>
>>I would not say that this is strange. The tcl/tk that is in cygwin, is
>>only for insight/gdb, as the comment says. It is not a full
>>distribution of tcl/tk. See the thread "tclsh83.exe should be
>>cygtclsh83.exe".
>
>Who do you think releases tcl/tk? I don't know why you'd think that I
>don't know what's going on here. This was basically a *generic*
That is a good question, I assume from the tone of your question, it is you.
However, I searched the cygwin-apps announce for the new release of tcl/tk
and found no mention of it. There is also no /usr/doc directory for tcl/tk.
I guess I am still a bit upset, that the tcl/tk from setup no longer does
what I need it to do. The older one was a more complete although very old
release. I do not think that a tcl/tk release meant only for python and gdb
is a very general solution. And there is a complete port of tcl/tk that works
with cygwin, so why not use that one.
-Bill
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -