Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3E38C631.6050301@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jan 2003 01:29:05 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: getopt_long behavior
References:	<E18dzmF-0002Lr-00 AT smtp03 DOT mrf DOT mail DOT rcn DOT net> <20030130010056 DOT GA3603 AT redhat DOT com> <3E38B5DB DOT 5090801 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20030130055757 DOT GA1554 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> He didn't say "cygwin kernel".  He said "cygwin suite", as in suite
> of programs.  If someone wants a cygwin distribution which uses
> non-posix options, they will have to recompile and rebuild the
> whole cygwin release.

Yes, you are correct.  I thought the original poster was only concerned 
with the behavior of a single "problematic" program; re-reading, it 
seems your interpretation is better.  Sorry for the noise.

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -