Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:15:01 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: getopt_long behavior
Message-ID:	<20030130011501.GB3603@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<E18dzmF-0002Lr-00 AT smtp03 DOT mrf DOT mail DOT rcn DOT net> <001301c2c7e8$11fb57e0$78d96f83 AT pomello>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<001301c2c7e8$11fb57e0$78d96f83@pomello>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:45:06PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
>would you accept a patch making getopt respond to a
>"POSIXLY_INCORRECT_GETOPT" envvar?

I'll make the change but it won't have the effect you think it will.
I guarantee it.  I will even make a snapshot and then you can watch
in horror and amazement as setting the environment variable has no
effect.

And for an answer to the riddle of why this won't immediately do what
you want, try this in the winsup/cygwin directory:

  grep -i getopt cygwin.din

(Remember not to put the -i at the end!)

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -