Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:00:56 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: getopt_long behavior
Message-ID:	<20030130010056.GA3603@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<E18dzmF-0002Lr-00 AT smtp03 DOT mrf DOT mail DOT rcn DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<E18dzmF-0002Lr-00@smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:29:47PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
>I orginally posted this message some time ago.  Having all of
>the cygwin tools lacking the ability to accept arguments in
>arbirtary order makes it more difficult to use them(I often do
>grep "string" *.c and then rerun with -i at the end).  Is
>there anyway to get around this without recompiling the whole
>cygwin suite from source code?

No.

>On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:52:01AM -0400, chrismorgan AT rcn DOT com
>wrote:
>>I noticed that getopt() and getopt_long() aren't doing reordering of
>>argv entries.  Searching the cygwin-developers mailing list I found
>>that this is due to compiling with POSIXLY_CORRECT set.  Is there any
>>plan to move back to not setting this variable?
>
>No.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -