Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:09:35 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: NTEA extensions for uid/gid
Message-ID:	<20030127140935.GT2117@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030127094057 DOT GJ2117 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0301271132440 DOT 2332-100000 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0301271132440.2332-100000@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i

On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:30:35PM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> In any case, seeing the behaviour of the exec-permission bits, I have a 
> "wouldn't it be nice if...": wouldn't it be nice if the executable 
> permission bits would actually correspond to the executability
> of a file? I mean, an explorer-created empty file is definitely not
> executable - notably because it's empty.

With ntsec on, stat() and friends report the permission bits set in
the ACL.  I wouldn't want to see anything else.  The code using the
mount info is only used when ntsec is off.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -