Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<20030125111419.14510.qmail@web21404.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Sat, 25 Jan 2003 22:14:19 +1100 (EST)
From:	=?iso-8859-1?q?Danny=20Smith?= <danny_r_smith_2001 AT yahoo DOT co DOT nz>
Subject:	Re:anyone have implicit linkage of gcc DLLs working in Visual C?
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, twest AT ee DOT washington DOT edu
MIME-Version:	1.0

-----------------
Todd West wrote

I'm experimenting with using Cygwin and gcc -shared to build Windows DLLs
which are called by code compiled by VC6.0 SP5 or the Intel C 7.0 plug-in
for VC.  I've using some very small stubs of test code and DLLs extracted
from Atlas 3.4.1.  Implicitly linked calls go down fine at compile and link
time with .libs generated by gcc, but seg fault at run time.  Explicit DLL
linkage works fine (e.g. LoadLibrary() and GetProcAddress()); I can even
make successful calls across C++ ABIs.

<snip>


The import libs built with GCC tools are not completely compatible with
expectations of MS tools.

To workaround, create a .DEF file for your nifty new gcc-built dll and use it
to make a MS-style import lib.  I haven't done this for awhile, but IIRC the
command line is something like:

lib /DEF:foo.def /OUT foo.lib

Then use the foo.lib in your MSVC environemnt as you would any MS built *.lib
file.

Danny

http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies
- What's on at your local cinema?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -