Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<114780-22003112020950598@M2W096.mail2web.com>
X-Priority:	3
Reply-To:	lhall AT rfk DOT com
X-Originating-IP:	209.113.174.244
From:	"lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com" <lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: accessing network shares through rlogin
Date:	Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:09:50 -0500
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	20 Jan 2003 20:09:50.0854 (UTC) FILETIME=[E389CA60:01C2C0BF]
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h0KK9xU13030

Never mind.  I forgot that there isn't the needed information (password) 
in the rhosts file for this.  So this isn't worth exploring (by anyone).
The original poster will have to be content to not use a .rhosts file,
use telnet, or set up a server running under his user credientials.  
All these options have been discussed before so I guess I should have
just pointed to the email archives originally. ;-)  

Sorry for the noise.

Larry

Original Message:
-----------------
From: Corinna Vinschen corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:58:40 +0100
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: accessing network shares through rlogin


On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:51:53AM -0500, lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com wrote:
> Right.  Windows authetication is the main hinderance.  
> However, as the poster pointed out, if you're forced to 
> enter your password (by the lack of a .rhosts file for an
> rsh session), then Windows password authentication
> occurs and shares are available.  But I guess I should 
> clarify the difference I see and the reason for my response.
> While key authentication (via ssh) can't provide the password
> protected share access, rsh access (with a .rhosts) should be
> able to based on the posters description.  That's the part 
> that I think could benefit from closer inspection.

Huh?  I don't understand what you're trying to say.  If rhosts
authentication takes place... how should Cygwin be able to create
a token with network credentials???

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -