Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/01/20/09:56:33
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:59:52AM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
>On Fri 17 Jan 2003 17:07, Christopher Faylor <cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:22:51AM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
>> >On Tue 14 Jan 2003 11:45, "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de> wrote:
>> >> H.Merijn schrieb:
>> >>
>> >> > On Mon 13 Jan 2003 18:14, "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de> wrote:
>> >> >> Jarkko schrieb:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi, could you retry this with either newer cygwin or bleadperl?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hmmm, the latest cygwin (1.3.18-1) is somewhat broken, but you may close
>> >> >> this bug anyway.
>> >>
>> >> > Closed. Gerrit, can you try the 20030113 snapshot, and see if it's gone with
>> >> > you too?
>> >>
>> >> Yes, Sir :-)
>> >
>> >[ Bleadperl development ]
>> >
>> >Yesterday's snap (20030116) gave me a signal 11 during Configure. also after
>> >reboot. 20030117 was showing the same behaviour
>>
>> Thanks for testing it. I can see that I introduced some problems. I'll have
>> them fixed shortly, I hope, as long as my pesky real job doesn't interfere.
>
>20030119 gave a full OK on bleadperl. Thanks.
>
>I'm not on this list, nor do I have time to deal with yet another high volume
>mailing list, so if you need something from me, either ask me directly, or
>contact Gerrit P. Haase.
I thought I had cc'ed you. Apologies.
>Do you think that using cygwin snapshots to build development versions of perl
>is valuable to the cygwin community? If so, I can make it a habbit to update
>one of the machines with that snapshot on a semi-automatic basis.
Yes, I think it is a real service. I wish I had someone who could just run
the actual cygwin testsuite on a regular basis, too. Running perl is a good
sanity check.
Thanks,
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -