Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.2.0.9.2.20030119094345.01d88290@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender:	rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date:	Sun, 19 Jan 2003 09:45:20 -0800
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject:	Re: linker can't find getsubopt()
In-Reply-To:	<20030119173218.GE22838@redhat.com>
References:	<018401c2bfda$acc6a330$78d96f83 AT pomello>
	<988BE481ACC95C429DCB909F74A3163A05D686 AT exchange-il>
	<018401c2bfda$acc6a330$78d96f83 AT pomello>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 09:32 2003-01-19, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 04:49:04PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
> >It appears getsubopt is in newlib, and so present in Cygwin's
> ><sys/unistd.h>, but not exported from cygwin1.dll
> >
> >One of Cygwin's core developers will need to tell us whether this is
> >accidental or on purpose.
>
>Oh, it's on purpose.  Believe me.  Caused someone some discomfort?  Then
>our evil plan is succeeding.  Core developers!  Raise your glasses and
>repeat after me "We are the core developers and we are MEAN!"
>
>It's a well know fact that we put functions in unistd.h which are not
>actually exported by cygwin just to tantalize and confuse people.  What
>other earthly reason would we have for dangling this tempting fruit in
>front of people, if not to frustrate them?
>
>Bwahahaha.
>
>cgf


I'm on to you, Chaotica.

Captain Proton


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -