Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	eos.vss.fsi.com: ford owned process doing -bs
Date:	Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:57:36 -0600 (CST)
From:	Brian Ford <ford AT vss DOT fsi DOT com>
X-X-Sender:	ford AT eos
To:	Richard Henderson <rth AT redhat DOT com>
cc:	Nick Clifton <nickc AT redhat DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>,
	<binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <dave AT beermex DOT com>, <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Support for DDWARF-2 debug info? (on Cygwin)
In-Reply-To:	<20030117225510.GC1898@redhat.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0301171656480.12926-100000@eos>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Thanks for the response.  I came to that ugly conclusion yesterday.

On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Richard Henderson wrote:

> No, dwarf specifies a section-relative address.  The issue is that,
> with the exception of IA-64, no target has section-relative relocations.
> So instead we force the VMA to zero such that the VMA address and
> the section offset are identical.
>
> If you cannot do this with PE, then you have to add new relocs.
> There's no other way around it.
>

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -