delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:18:20AM -0600, Brian Ford wrote: > I am still consulting the DWARF2 spec to see if gcc and gas are > correct in generating VMA addresses. If so, I guess I have to fix the > dwarf parsing code in bfd and gdb to subtract the section base VMA. No, dwarf specifies a section-relative address. The issue is that, with the exception of IA-64, no target has section-relative relocations. So instead we force the VMA to zero such that the VMA address and the section offset are identical. If you cannot do this with PE, then you have to add new relocs. There's no other way around it. r~ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |