Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Fish" <fish AT infidels DOT org>
To:	"Cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Missed patch? (gettimeofday time travels V2)
Date:	Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:55:15 -0800
Message-ID:	<000001c2bb91$824a13a0$0100a8c0@asswipe>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Is there any reason why Philip Aston's 6 Jul 2002 patch to
gettimeofday et. al. logic to correct for WM_POWERBROADCAST events
(PBT_APMRESUMESUSPEND, PBT_APMRESUMEAUTOMATIC, PBT_APMRESUMECRITICAL)
hasn't made it into the sources yet?

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg00962.html

Was this perhaps just a simple oversight? Or was there another reason
for it not being applied?

Thanks.

- -- 
"Fish" (David B. Trout)
   fish AT infidels DOT org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPiOmQUj11/TE7j4qEQIqVACg9exKrKE0ZMzmZavfzBzFkgBY/4UAn35W
JMjtv6fzDXQqQ8xQEXbG1kUq
=9Hmb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -