delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/01/12/01:43:39

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "LA Walsh" <law AT tlinx DOT org>
To: "'Elfyn McBratney'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: mean & grumpy (cygwin path analysis)
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:43:02 -0800
Message-ID: <000b01c2ba05$dab65360$1403a8c0@sc.tlinx.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
In-Reply-To: <005901c2b9c9$62ed0220$c95186d9@webdev>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h0C6hYV19830

> What so it's the list managers fault? The reason you don't 
> have to subscribe to this list, I'm guessing, is to make it 
> easier for new user's post here instead of *forcing* them to 
> sign-up first. If thats being "different" and violates 
> "normal expectations" then I obviously cannot argue with you 
> on this matter. If you send a mail to a mailing list, come to 
> realise that you used the wrong address, do you then go back 
> and send it again even though it's already got there?
===
Well, not no more...now that I know this list doesn't bounce.


> I think that was referring to why you we're sending 
> duplicates to the list YA. A lot of things are mean in your 
> opinion aren't they?
---
	Yep.  Just a mean mean world.  Very very sad...:-(((!
(:-))

	In fact, I think it is soooOOOOooo mean -- that...
well it just is!  Pblblblblt.

> 
> > Banning simple HTML formatting in email is like banning magazine 
> > layout in
> favor of 8.5x11 Courier-typed 'articles'.
> 
> When you (and others on the list) sends mails they eventually 
> get processed by Mhonarc, the archiving software, and the 
> body of the message is placed in <PRE> tags so even if HTML 
> formatting was allowed it wouldn't get the desired effect. 
> You will also find that this is not the only list on the net 
> that doesn't allow mime-encoded mails.
====
	I know -- a lot of lists don't -- its just that 
it's seems a giant step backwards in terms of communication --
even handwriting is more expressive -- even a real typewriter
could do underlining, and bold.  How about RTF?  Is that
portable enough?  Just feels like I'm stuck in the 70's.
The TTY's have gotten fancier, but its still mostly ascii text in terminal windows...sorta sad (not mean though..thats different), though it could be mean if it was a conspiracy...) :-)

-l



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019