Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/01/09/12:25:08
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:49:43AM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:44:36AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >Would you be willing to to consider the following:
> >
> > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-10/msg00116.html
> >
> >Or, is it too esoteric for you?
>
> Judging by the description, that sounds more like a patch for the FSF
> inetutils maintainer than for the Cygwin inetutils maintainer.
I agree. I don't really want to add functionality besides what is
normal for this inetutils. In the long run, we should consider to
get rid of this inetutils anyway and substitute them by a new version
started via cygrunsrv or sysvinit resp.
Oh btw... wouldn't you better like to maintain ProFTPd for Cygwin? ;-)
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -