delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-Id: | <5.2.0.9.2.20030109084211.01e86d88@pop3.cris.com> |
X-Sender: | rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com |
Date: | Thu, 09 Jan 2003 08:48:02 -0800 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com> |
Subject: | Recent (1.3.18) Pipe Changes |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Hi, Am I to understand from the lack of any response to my and other people's reports of long delays in pipe access under Cygwin 1.3.18 when low-priority CPU demand is present that this behavior is not considered problematic, undesirable or unacceptable? Is there any chance of getting better behavior short of providing the solution myself? Randy -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |