Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3E19AEE9.2060107@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Mon, 06 Jan 2003 11:29:29 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [Mostly to Charles Wilson] Upgrading Cygwin's CVS
References:	<00df01c2b43e$774f6860$fc78883e AT pomello> <3E178348 DOT 1090805 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20030106140854 DOT GA1964 AT tishler DOT net> <1041862980 DOT 14306 DOT 57 DOT camel AT lifelesslap>

Robert Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 01:08, Jason Tishler wrote:
> 
>>On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 07:58:48PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>
>>>Because of all that, I'd pretty much decided that the next time I
>>>update the 'cvs' package, I'm going to use the cvsnt codebase
>>
>>Well, there's always Subversion:
>>
>>    http://subversion.tigris.org
>>
>>:,)
> 
> 
> Or arch
> http://www.fifthvision.net

Yes -- but I don't maintain the 'arch' or 'subversion' package.  I 
maintain the 'cvs' package. (You're not going to tell me that 
'arch'/'subversion' are drop-in replacements for cvs/cvsnt, are you?)

So, I'll stick with the cvs variants, and leave 'arch'/'subversion' for 
someone else to contribute and maintain.

--Chuck


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -