Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.2.0.9.2.20030104184852.02992168@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender:	rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date:	Sat, 04 Jan 2003 18:54:21 -0800
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject:	Re: 1.3.18: slow pipe performance when cpu busy
In-Reply-To:	<3E179BD2.2060702@acm.org>
Mime-Version:	1.0

David,

I reported this exact same thing on Dec. 26, '02 (Subject: "Delays With 
Pipes In Cygwin 1.3.18").

For me having a CPU soaker going is not optional ("You have completed more 
work units than 99.199% of our users.", if you get my drift) and I make 
extensive use of pipes both explicitly and buried in scripts and shell 
procedures, so this is an intolerable situation for me and for that reason 
I've also backed off to 1.3.17 until some kind of resolution is reached.

I was going to use strace to see if it would disclose anything more 
interesting or detailed, but I'm fresh out of round tuits.

By the way, you said your cygcheck output was attached, but it appeared 
in-line. Check to make sure your mailer is not configured to put text-only 
attachments in-line with the message body.

Randall Schulz


At 18:43 2003-01-04, David Rothenberger wrote:
>I've noticed slow pipe performance when my CPU is busy running 
>low-priority programs (e.g., SETI AT home).  For example, if I run:
>
>% grep keychain .profile
>
>the command completes very fast.  However, when I run
>
>% cat .profile | grep keychain
>
>the command takes 6-7 seconds to complete.  However, if I kill SETI AT home, 
>the command completes quickly.
>
>(BTW, SETI AT home is running at Low priority as reported by Windows.)
>
>I do not have this problem if I revert back to 1.3.17.
>
>cygcheck output is attached.  Please let me know if there's more info I 
>can provide.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -