Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<20021224051134.95173.qmail@web21408.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Dec 2002 16:11:34 +1100 (EST)
From:	=?iso-8859-1?q?Danny=20Smith?= <danny_r_smith_2001 AT yahoo DOT co DOT nz>
Subject:	Re:Strange behaviour of gcc
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	fabrizio_ge-wolit AT tiscali DOT it
MIME-Version:	1.0

fabrizio_ge-wolit AT tiscali DOT it wrote:
> Can somebody explain why gcc (version 3.2 20020927) on Cygwin does
> this? Type this simple C program
>
> void func(void){
>   struct {unsigned char data[3985];}var;
> }
>
> and compile with
>
> gcc -c filename.c
>
> Then type
>
> nm filename.o
>
> The output is
>
> 00000000 b .bss
> 00000000 d .data
> 00000000 t .text
>          U __alloca
> 00000000 T _func
>
> Why on earth is the symbol __alloca doing there?
>
> Just change the program to
>
> void func(void){
>   struct {unsigned char data[3984];}var;
> }
>
> and compile it. This time, nm's output is
>
> 00000000 b .bss
> 00000000 d .data
> 00000000 t .text
> 00000000 T _func
>
> as it should. Is there a reason why the symbol __alloca appears?


GCC's __builtin_alloca uses a helper function called _alloca to check the stack
whenever allocating more that 4000  bytes in one go.

Danny

http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies
- What's on at your local cinema?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -