Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.2.0.9.2.20021222193251.02837d18@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender:	rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date:	Sun, 22 Dec 2002 19:56:04 -0800
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject:	Re: what to use in g++ instead of GetOpt?
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0212222154400.5047-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References:	<5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20021221185540 DOT 027a74a8 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Howdy, Igor,

Yes. I guess the oxymoron confused me, especially since I always program in 
the buff.

Randy
(why not?)


At 19:12 2002-12-22, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>Umm, Randy, not to downplay the humor or the valid points in your
>soliloquy, but he did say "well-dressed C++ programmers", and everybody
>knows (tm) that Real Programmers aren't well-dressed (they also don't use
>C++, it's for the wavering who can't decide between C and Java [to
>paraphrase]).  Of course, this also depends on your definition of
>"well-dressed"...
>     Igor


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -