delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | "Ralf Habacker" <Ralf DOT Habacker AT freenet DOT de> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, <binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: [PATCH] exclude runtime-pseudo-reloc symbols from auto-export |
Date: | Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:26:14 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <012401c2a926$d3d57bb0$0a1c440a@BRAMSCHE> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
Importance: | Normal |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
In-Reply-To: | <20021221171952.GA22113@redhat.com> |
>> > >What about putting such symbols in another named text section, so that > >ld would ignore them ? > > I don't see how you could do that since the symbol is associated with an > existing place in memory. We could put the whole function in a > different segment I had in mind something like this #define NO_EXPORT_TEXT __attribute__((section(".text_no_export"))) #define NO_EXPORT_DATA __attribute__((section(".data_no_export"))) but this need some additional efforts in the ld source. > but that's not the kind of solution I was thinking of. > > I was thinking that there might be an unused attribute that could be > pressed into service as a "don't auto export" (doesn't linux/elf have > something like this?) or that there was a way to name the symbol in some > way that wasn't easily available from a C program, like putting a "." in > the name with an asm alias. The weak attribute does not have any effect for at least gcc version 2.95.3-5 (cygwin special) and I can't see any other attribute, which could be used from http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.2/gcc/Function-Attributes.html#Function%20At tributes Perhaps somebody else could see something usefull or the gcc could be patched to uses the weak attribute ??? Ralf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |