| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 06:48:09PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 15:39, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> Maybe the horse has left the barn already but it would have been nice >> (tm) if these type of symbols were marked in some generic way so that >> we wouldn't have to keep remembering to extend this table. > >I recall commenting on this aspect in a recent binutils thread in the >cygwin lists, and being told that it didn't matter. > >Ha! Didn't you suggest that anything in a library residing in /usr/lib or /usr/local/lib be excluded? That's not quite the same thing as what I was musing about. I was talking about marking individual symbols. Symbols can be global or static. On elf-supporting symbols global symbols can also be marked "weak". On windows they could be marked "no-export". cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |