Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Path:	not-for-mail
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] exclude runtime-pseudo-reloc symbols from auto-export
Date:	Sat, 21 Dec 2002 11:16:01 -0500
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<3E0493C1.6040802@ece.gatech.edu>
References:	<3E03ECC8 DOT 5000605 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20021221043926 DOT GC18824 AT redhat DOT com> <1040456890 DOT 7654 DOT 1 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
Cc:	binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com

Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 15:39, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> 
>>Maybe the horse has left the barn already but it would have been nice
>>(tm) if these type of symbols were marked in some generic way so that
>>we wouldn't have to keep remembering to extend this table.
> 
> 
> I recall commenting on this aspect in a recent binutils thread in the
> cygwin lists, and being told that it didn't matter.
> 
> Ha!
> 
> Humourously yours,

Quit yer laughin.  I said at the time that yes, it is a pain -- but the 
alternatives are even worse.  "Mark the symbols in some generic way" -- 
now THAT's fragile. <g>

--Chuck




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -