Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/12/20/11:08:07
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Gerald S. Williams wrote:
> [snip]
> If cgf wants an otter, we should be looking into how to get a good
> drawing of one. Preferably a mean one, I guess. :-) I suppose we can
> give it sunglasses at least. Or have it smashing through a window
> carrying twin machine-guns. :-) :-)
Hmmm, I have a feeling I'm opening a whole new can of worms by returning
to this old discussion, but I bought this really cool-looking stone
figurine of an otter recently. I've found a site that sells them on the
internet, just so people have an idea of what it looks like:
http://www.funcollections.com/second/otters.html (for the record, I have
the one called Oprah; it looks much cuter "in person" :-D).
Now the question I have is simple: I know the otter itself is copyrighted
artwork, but what about the photographs? Does the copyright belong to the
artist, or to whomever took the photograph? In other words, if I snapped
a picture of that otter, could we use it?
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Oh, boy, virtual memory! Now I'm gonna make myself a really *big* RAMdisk!
-- /usr/games/fortune
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -