Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:04:32 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin License related Query....
Message-ID:	<20021218200432.GB15823@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4223A04BF7D1B941A25246ADD0462FF55D5463 AT blr-m3-msg DOT wipro DOT com> <20021218155657 DOT GD11184 AT redhat DOT com> <3E00CBE3 DOT 9070502 AT cotagesoft DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3E00CBE3.9070502@cotagesoft.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 11:26:27AM -0800, Shankar Unni wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Btw, I was trying to move this discussion off of the public list because
>>it probably isn't of much interest to people there.  
>
>Well, ..
>
>The Red Hat Cygwin Product pages are marvelously content-free when it 
>comes to cost and content (i.e. which version) information.

They are not content-free of contact information, though.

>Other mixed-license products (MySQL, etc.) are quite up-front about 
>licensing requirements, costs and versions supported commercially, with 
>exhaustive detail in their web pages. Perhaps Red Hat can be a little 
>more explicit on their pages?

Just click on the contact Red Hat site.  Cygwin is not MySQL.  That should
be fairly obvious.  The licensing issues are much trickier.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -