Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Path:	not-for-mail
From:	Shankar Unni <shankar AT cotagesoft DOT com>
Subject:	Re: cygwin License related Query....
Date:	Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:26:27 -0800
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<3E00CBE3.9070502@cotagesoft.com>
References:	<4223A04BF7D1B941A25246ADD0462FF55D5463 AT blr-m3-msg DOT wipro DOT com> <20021218155657 DOT GD11184 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Btw, I was trying to move this discussion off of the public list because
> it probably isn't of much interest to people there.  

Well, ..

The Red Hat Cygwin Product pages are marvelously content-free when it 
comes to cost and content (i.e. which version) information.

Other mixed-license products (MySQL, etc.) are quite up-front about 
licensing requirements, costs and versions supported commercially, with 
exhaustive detail in their web pages. Perhaps Red Hat can be a little 
more explicit on their pages?

--
Shankar.




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -