Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/12/16/10:49:54
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:26:27AM -0800, James Michael DuPont wrote:
>As promised, I have started to check the releases
>of cygwin by bootstrapping them.
>This one got pretty far, all the way to libstdc++-v3.
>
>The error is :
>../../../../include/getopt.h:115: declaration of C function `int
>getopt()'
> conflicts with
>/usr/include/sys/unistd.h:125: previous declaration `int getopt(int,
>char* const*, const char*)' here
In case it isn't clear, I *do not care* about this problem. I am able to
build gcc myself with no problem. I *don't care* if it doesn't work for
you since the fix is so completely trivial.
If you want to suggest a fix that goes beyond making the obvious change
to ../include/getopt.h, then send it to the gcc mailing list.
Otherwise, these reports are just noise here.
You've got a functional gcc compiler use it. If you want to build it yourself,
then fix the source and move on.
How many times do I have to say this???
cgf
>Please note that the make boostrap does not work with gcc 3.2-3
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -