Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
Path:	not-for-mail
From:	Andrew DeFaria <ADeFaria AT Salira DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Force bash to start as administrator
Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:59:37 -0800
Lines:	40
Message-ID:	<3DF7C359.2050808@Salira.com>
References:	<3DF7AEB9 DOT 7020000 AT Salira DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0212111649120 DOT 12239-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	206.184.204.2
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	main.gmane.org 1039647670 7936 206.184.204.2 (11 Dec 2002 23:01:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:01:10 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en, ru, zh

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>
>> Please don't email me directly - keep it on the list!
>
>
> My mailer (pine) replies to the sender and Cc's to the list unless 
> there's a Reply-To. Many people aren't subscribed to the list, and 
> thus would prefer the mail sent directly to them. It is nigh 
> impossible to keep track of individual preferences, so it helps to 
> provide a Reply-To header if you want the response to go to the list. 
> I'm modifying this particular message to go to the list only, but in 
> the future, as a courtesy to people replying to your messages, please 
> set a Reply-To header to indicate your preference.

Ah and there's the rub. I had previously set Reply-To but I use the 
gname gateway to news. And when I set Reply-To this breaks the gname 
gateway and I cannot post though it.

IMHO, mail lists are mail lists and if you wish to follow the action 
then you participate. You state that many people aren't subscribed to 
the list. As you (and I) do not know how many people are not subscribed 
vs. how many people are subscribed it's fair to say that many people are 
subscribed to the list to and do not need additional email. So one could 
go either way - either always mail back to the list and cc the poster or 
always mail back to the list and not cc the poster. Who's to say who is 
more correct? I think, givein that mail lists are supposed to be 
participtory in nature things should be kept on the list and if people 
are interested then they will come to the list for answers and subscribe.

Otherwise I will simply set up a filter to ignore all email from you :-) !

Again, I don't appreciate getting email that's a copy of what I'll be 
reading on the list shortly anyway.

> Oh, and the previous message was Cc'd to the list.

Yes I noticed. I was talking about the CC'ing to me part.




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -