delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/12/11/15:20:41

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <123820-2200212311202028333@M2W095.mail2web.com>
X-Priority: 3
Reply-To: lhall AT rfk DOT com
X-Originating-IP: 209.113.174.244
From: "lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com" <lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
To: rudy AT viper DOT iasi DOT rdsnet DOT ro, pete DOT harter AT itt DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin question - hopefully a quickie
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:20:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2002 20:20:28.0630 (UTC) FILETIME=[BF28AF60:01C2A152]
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id gBBKKfh02886

Well, that's a reasonable recommendation but, as it turns out,
it won't work unless the VIM package is installed and if VIM 
is installed, it's not necessary to do this manually, since 
the link is created as part of the installation of this package.

Here's the FAQ entry that should prove useful when trying to figure 
out what Cygwin package a particular utility is in.

What packages should I download?
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_2.html#SEC13

Ah the FAQ.  It's a wonderfull concept! ;-)

Larry


Original Message:
-----------------
From: Corneliu Rudeanu rudy AT viper DOT iasi DOT rdsnet DOT ro
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:01:38 +0200 (EET)
To: Pete DOT Harter AT itt DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin question - hopefully a quickie


On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Harter, Pete wrote:

> Christopher:
> I downloaded a version of Cygwin (can't remember the source; one of those
> from the http://www.cygwin.com/ <http://www.cygwin.com/>  list) onto my
new
> machine which uses Win 2000 Professional OS.   I just now noticed that it
> doesn't recognize the "ex"  (batch vi editor) command.   I've used Cygwin
> (again, I don't know the source) before on the Win NT environment, and it
> recognized the "ex" command OK.
> 
> What can I use as a substitute for the "ex" command?
> 

ln -sf /usr/bin/vim.exe /usr/bin/ex

Best Regards,
rudy


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019