Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:08:45 +0100
From:	thomas <tom AT huno DOT net>
Reply-To:	thomas <tom AT huno DOT net>
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<44125937.20021211150845@huno.net>
To:	cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: pipe improvements in snapshot
In-Reply-To:	<20021211041250.GA31215@redhat.com>
References:	<20021211041250 DOT GA31215 AT redhat DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Christopher Faylor <cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:

> Please check out the latest snapshot and report here if there are
> problems.  I haven't yet tried this on Windows 9x class systems so it's
> entirely possible that there is a problem there.

It seems to work great! I did a few tests and there was no delay anymore
whatsoever. I've just sent the dll to someone to try out on a 9x system.

One thing about the possible data loss: Is that true data loss, like
some bytes won't make it trough the pipe, or will that only result in a
delay because the bytes have to be send again?

I will do some more thourough tests and will report back.

Thanks so far!
thomas


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -