Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:21:28 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	jjohnstn AT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: strtof is missing
Message-ID:	<20021205222128.GB2282@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, jjohnstn AT redhat DOT com
References:	<200211240004 DOT 04863 DOT jblazi AT gmx DOT de> <177909597 DOT 20021124103437 AT vtc DOT ru> <20021124105015 DOT X1398 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3DEE5BD8 DOT 5000408 AT redhat DOT com> <20021205103407 DOT N1140 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <1039081042 DOT 13185 DOT 84 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20021205145838 DOT GD16892 AT redhat DOT com> <3DEFAEE0 DOT 7080407 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3DEFAEE0.7080407@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:54:08PM -0500, J. Johnston wrote:
>Chris,
>
>  Can you clarify.  Do you want me to duplicate the routine or
>stick with the solution I originally presented which is to rename
>the routine and leave a #define that maps the old name to the
>new one.

I think your plan is fine.  I think just renaming the function in newlib
and creating a define to deal with legacy newlib apps is the correct way
to handle this.  We can also make modifications in the cygwin side to
make it transparent to the end user.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -