Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:17:50 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Resolved Re: gcc-3.2-1/i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/genflags is segfaulting
Message-ID:	<20021203171750.GC3443@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1038913777 DOT 10958 DOT 32 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20021203115206 DOT 10396 DOT qmail AT web13310 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20021203115206.10396.qmail@web13310.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:52:06AM -0800, James Michael DuPont wrote:
>Maybe this should be a release criterion?

Not interested.  Sorry.

>Maybe you don't care if the gcc is fully usable before it is release?

GCC *is* fully usable.  If you can't build it, use the gcc binary that
is provided.  As you've probably surmised, I don't have the time or
inclination to help other people try to figure out how to build gcc.  I
have no idea why it would be segfaulting or how to fix it.

I suggest debugging the problem in gdb and offering solutions to the
appropriate mailing list, which would be the gcc or gcc-patches mailing
list in this case.

cgf
--
Please do not send me personal email with cygwin questions or observations.
Use the resources at http://cygwin.com/ .

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -