Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:47:36 -0500
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Cygwin 1.3.17 changes ls -l output
In-reply-to:	<20021203151507.GA326007@WORLDNET>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-followup-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id:	<20021203154736.GA1368@tishler.net>
MIME-version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i
References:	<20021203123649 DOT GA1788 AT tishler DOT net>
	<20021203151507 DOT GA326007 AT WORLDNET>

Pierre,

On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:15:07AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 07:36:49AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Was this change intentional?  Or, was it a side effect of the
> > following?
> > 
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 07:15:17PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > - Fix Sun acl functions.  (Corinna Vinschen, Pierre Humblet)
> 
> It is a side effect. 
> The + indicates that the ACL contains more entries than necessary to
> represent the Unix modes. 

Thanks for the above clarification.

Should the "+" be suppressed?  Or, should Cygwin behave like other
Unixes (e.g., Solaris, HP-UX, etc.) that support ACLs?

If the latter, then I need to submit a patch for one of the Python
regression tests.

Thanks,
Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -