Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:05:21 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	"Cygwin AT Cygwin DOT Com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Question about Cygwin license
Message-ID:	<20021202120521.B3241@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	"Cygwin AT Cygwin DOT Com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<LPEHIHGCJOAIPFLADJAHOELHDBAA DOT chris AT atomice DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<LPEHIHGCJOAIPFLADJAHOELHDBAA.chris@atomice.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 10:22:01PM -0000, Chris January wrote:
> Can standard GPL v2 code be included in Cygwin?

No.  It's incompatible with the Cygwin license.

> What if I look at how that code does something and then write my own
> implementation? What if the two implementations are very similar?

In theory, by looking into the sources you are tainted.

> What if I tell someone else on the mailing list how to do it?

Shouldn't be a problem.  If that person then writes it's own
implementation, it's ok.  A "howto" isn't code.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -