Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3DE8E77D.3000603@lapo.it>
Date:	Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:29:49 +0100
From:	Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021122
X-Accept-Language:	it, en, fr, es
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Mailing List: CygWin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: cygwin's autoconf?
References:	<3DE8CDE5 DOT 8060307 AT lapo DOT it> <012101c2987f$67c9eb70$78d96f83 AT pomello>

>
>
>I believe that autoreconf isn't entirely reliable.
>
>This is the reason that projects (e.g. libgetopt++) often have a
>bootstrap.sh which runs the relevant autotools.
>
Doing "aclocal && automake && autoconf" as the autobook suggests doesn't 
change things... =(
(or: it does seldom work, but usually doesn't.. that's why I'm thinking 
about granularity in NT's timekeeping)

-- 
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -