Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/11/28/22:37:11
Great, so at last we know the situation. My question is "What has
changed?". I seem to recall ObjcC as part of the 2.95 gcc release, and I'm
just wondering if there's is some fundamental difficulty in gcc3 that has
caused it's removal?
Unfortunately, I don't have the time to make a package, even if we could. I
would like to use ObjC on Cygwin though.
- Steve
At 06:39 PM 11/28/2002 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 09:27:52AM -0600, Dockeen wrote:
> >"Well this needs to be integrated INTO gcc"
> >
> >Uhhh, only one problem with this statement, its not right. Going to the gcc
> >web site,
> >I find:
> >
> >"GCC is the GNU Compiler Collection, which currently contains front ends
> >for C, C++, Objective-C, Fortran, Java, and Ada"
> >
> >Which is consistent with discussions I had on another board with a developer
> >that uses ObjectiveC.
> >
> >Check out the gcc sites:
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/
>
>Yep, these are all fascinating arguments. However, I'm not going to be
>including Objective-C into gcc. I will be breaking out things into
>different packages at some point as soon as I get motivated to do so.
>It is certainly not impossible for someone to build their own Objective
>C package and I certainly wouldn't object to someone else doing it.
>
>cgf
>
>--
>Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
>Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -