delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: compressing cygcheck output considered harmful? |
From: | Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
In-Reply-To: | <20021127022327.GA27364@redhat.com> |
References: | <20021127022327 DOT GA27364 AT redhat DOT com> |
Date: | 27 Nov 2002 12:29:12 +1100 |
Message-Id: | <1038360552.23476.472.camel@lifelesswks> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
--=-83zqYWT4A5rMylZixfvE Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:23, Christopher Faylor wrote: >=20 > Does it make sense not to send cygcheck output in compressed format? Yes. Rob --=20 --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. --- --=-83zqYWT4A5rMylZixfvE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA95B/oI5+kQ8LJcoIRAmmQAKC7T5LvLMeXiirComrz1n7u+twUswCgmqrm Jdwq57ASRqyp0CttjujuxuY= =pV7z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-83zqYWT4A5rMylZixfvE--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |