Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/11/25/15:54:20
Peter A. Castro wrote:
> And, just to provide a counter example: I always run Norton AntiVirus
> with automatic / background scanning enabled. I generally have to,
> because of infected machines at work which probe the network whenever we
> get hit with the latest rash of viruses :(. I've done all my Cygwin
> installs/updates with AntiVirus enabled and never had a BSOD (I'm running
> NT4 on fairly stable hardware and up to date drivers). So, it is
> possible and if something does fail, it more like a driver fault than an
> application fault.
Yes, it HAS to be a "driver" fault (more accurately, it CANNOT be an
application fault). Applications run in ring 3 (call it "user mode" --
but it's a protected execution mode enforced by the x86 processor
hardware). drivers and such (like virus scanners) run in ring 0 (call
it kernel mode) along with the ntos kernel. If you get a BSOD, it is by
definition a ring 0 fault == kernel mode == drivers/virus-scanner/kernel
problem. [AFAIK, ring 1 and ring 2 are not used by MSWin]
Now, as far as Norton vs. McAfee, the setup.exe BSODs have most often
been reported wrt McAfee. I only recall one report from a year back or
more where Norton was the culprit.
--Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -