delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/11/23/09:33:38

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:39:16 -0500
From: Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject: Re: Make-Problem Postgres on Cygwin
In-reply-to: <IEEEIIEOMKMOKHPPJGJICEEIFDAA.tarabas@tarabas.de>
To: Tarabas <tarabas AT tarabas DOT de>
Cc: Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, Pgsql-Cygwin <pgsql-cygwin AT postgresql DOT org>
Mail-followup-to: Tarabas <tarabas AT tarabas DOT de>, Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>,
Pgsql-Cygwin <pgsql-cygwin AT postgresql DOT org>
Message-id: <20021123143916.GA2156@tishler.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
References: <20021122142031 DOT GB1584 AT tishler DOT net>
<IEEEIIEOMKMOKHPPJGJICEEIFDAA DOT tarabas AT tarabas DOT de>

Manuel,

Sigh...

Repeat after me:

    Post instead of sending private email.

    Keep replies on-list.

    Post instead of sending private email.

    Keep replies on-list.

    ...

On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 06:48:39PM +0100, Tarabas wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your help! The "make" and "make install" worked fine
> after the patch BUT I sadly have to bother you again.
> 
> After I did the ./initdb /usr/local/pgsql/data
> and the ./postmaster -D /usr/local/pgsql/data -i &
> 
> and then tried to do ANYTHING on the DB (either connecting via pgAdmin
> oder createdb or createuser), I get the Message:
> 
> "FATAL 1: IndexSupportInitialize: bogus pg_index tuple"
> 
> Any suggestions ?!

No.  I just ran a gcc3 postmaster (i.e., postgres.exe) against a
previously initialized database without any problems.  From posts to
pgsql-cygwin@, I'm under the impression that others have successfully
built, initialized (i.e., ran initdb), and ran postmaster with my
supplied patches.

> I used the gcc3-patch to compile postgres. Initdb ran fine without any
> errors and the postmaster started fine too. Could this still be
> related to that patch ?!

I don't think so.

Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019