Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 21 Nov 2002 23:24:47 +0100
From:	thomas <tom AT huno DOT net>
Reply-To:	thomas <tom AT huno DOT net>
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<10823177609.20021121232447@huno.net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: old cygwin distributions
In-Reply-To:	<022101c291aa$97665890$78d96f83@pomello>
References:	<7916445640 DOT 20021121213235 AT huno DOT net>
	<01c901c291a1$476f16a0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <1119233000 DOT 20021121221902 AT huno DOT net>
	<022101c291aa$97665890$78d96f83 AT pomello>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Max Bowsher <maxb AT ukf DOT net> wrote:

> Well, theoretically, you could rebuild an older version from cvs. But it
> would probably be easier to help track down the bug and get it fixed.

oh i am more than willing to help. just that noone replied to my
bugreport yet :)

thomas


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -