Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.1.0.14.2.20021120104601.02de6cc8@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender:	rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date:	Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:51:18 -0800
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject:	Re: .rhosts on W2K w/o ntsec
In-Reply-To:	<3DDBD796.6050004@csgsystems.com>
References:	<3DDAB456 DOT 4000303 AT csgsystems DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Christian,

Use "cygstart docFile" instead of "cmd /c docFile" Cygstart doesn't require 
the execute bit on the document file as "cmd /c" does.

I don't know how cygstart works internally, but I imagine it looks up the 
association and launches the appropriate application without regard for the 
execute bits on the document file being opened.

Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


At 10:42 2002-11-20, Christian Mueller wrote:
>>...
>
>I just did some tests with CYGWIN=ntsec and it seems as if it's better 
>than it used to be a year ago or so. The only thing that doesn't work is 
>typing something like "cmd /c xxx.doc" to start the according application 
>automatically if the according file is not executable but I can write a 
>little script that looks into /proc/registry and figures out how to open a 
>file of a given type.
>
>I'll give it a shot, convert all my files to NT security and see how it 
>goes. Thanks again.
>
>Cheers,
>--Christian


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -