Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/11/20/06:51:47
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:12:51PM +0100, Tino Lange wrote:
> The only point that is left is the cygcheck.out - did you mean that?
Yes.
> OK - why didn't I include a "cygcheck.out"?
>
> a) maybe the information was already enough for you to locate the problem
No.
> b) "cygwin AT cogwin DOT com" is a huge list - I don't want to spam lots of
> people with this information - if someone needs it I can send it to him
> personally I don't like to recieve lot's of cygcheck.out a day as a
> public reader of this list myself.
It's one (better: the) purpose of the cygwin ML to send bug reports here
and to receive help if somebody actually knows a solution.
> c) cygcheck.out can contain *lots* of personal information. I don't want
> Microsoft to spy on my computer why should I broadcast such information
> by myself actively on a mailinglist that's very huge, get's archived and
> so on?????
Then obfuscate stuff in the cygcheck output which you take for private.
> I have no Problem sending this file to you, Corinna, or some of your
Perhaps, but *I* have problems with getting PM about Cygwin stuff.
Did you read the section "Shouldn't I just send email to straight to a
cygwin developer or package maintainer?", especially the "Reply-To:"
passage?
> You just got it with separate mail.
No, I didn't so far and I don't want to get PM further on. This is the
reason I'm setting the Reply-To: to the ML and not using my real mail
address.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -