Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 2002 23:37:07 -0500
From:	"Pierre A. Humblet" <pierre DOT humblet AT ieee DOT org>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ls problem
Message-ID:	<20021120043707.GB92984047@HPN5170X>
References:	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0211172332260 DOT 4275-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021119074303 DOT 0276a4d0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <007a01c290cd$cc3165c0$437517d2 AT astra03> <20021120035649 DOT GA70013211 AT HPN5170X> <20021120040932 DOT GA92984047 AT HPN5170X> <20021120041859 DOT GA2406 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20021120041859.GA2406@redhat.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i

On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:18:59PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> The delay is apparently ls doing things that haven't been straced.  I don't
> know what could be causing the delay.  It would be interesting to see what
> the task manager says is happening during this time.  Does ls spike the
> CPU?
 
Chris is right. 
On my WinME there is a 150 ~ 200 ms delay at the same spot.
Sorry about the F: drive.

Pierre


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -